MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051726714 · doi:10.1117/12.926721

The Gemini Planet Imager: integration and status

2012· article· en· W2051726714 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce Macintosh, André Anthony, Jennifer Atwood, Nicolas A. Barriga, Brian Bauman, Kris Caputa, J. Chilcote, Daren Dillon, René Doyon, Jennifer Dunn, Donald T. Gavel, Ramon Galvez, Stephen J. Goodsell, James R. Graham, Markus Hartung, Joshua Isaacs, Dan Kerley, Quinn Konopacky, Kathleen Labrie, James Larkin, Jérôme Maîre, Christian Marois, Maxwell A. Millar‐Blanchaer, Arturo Núñez, Rebecca Oppenheimer, David W. Palmer, John Pazder, Marshall D. Perrin, Lisa Poyneer, Carlos Quirez, F. Rantakyrö, Vlad Reshtov, Leslie Saddlemyer, Naru Sadakuni, Dmitry Savransky, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, Malcolm J. Smith, Rémi Soummer, Sandrine Thomas, J. Kent Wallace, Jason Weiss, Sloane Wiktorowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanetComputer scienceAstrobiologyRemote sensingAstronomyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gemini Planet Imager is a next-generation instrument for the direct detection and characterization of young warm exoplanets, designed to be an order of magnitude more sensitive than existing facilities. It combines a 1700-actuator adaptive optics system, an apodized-pupil Lyot coronagraph, a precision interferometric infrared wavefront sensor, and a integral field spectrograph. All hardware and software subsystems are now complete and undergoing integration and test at UC Santa Cruz. We will present test results on each subsystem and the results of end-to-end testing. In laboratory testing, GPI has achieved a raw contrast (without post-processing) of 10<sup>-6</sup> 5σ at 0.4”, and with multiwavelength speckle suppression, 2x10<sup>-7</sup> at the same separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207