A novel form of NF‐κB is induced by <i>Leishmania </i>infection: Involvement in macrophage gene expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leishmania spp. are obligate intracellular parasites that inhabit the phagolysosomes of macrophages. Manipulation of host cell signaling pathways and gene expression by Leishmania is critical for Leishmania's survival and resultant pathology. Here, we show that infection of macrophages with Leishmania promastigotes in vitro causes specific cleavage of the NF-kappaB p65 RelA subunit. Cleavage occurs in the cytoplasm and is dependent on the Leishmania protease gp63. The resulting fragment, p35 RelA, migrates to the nucleus, where it binds DNA as a heterodimer with NF-kappaB p50. Importantly, induction of chemokine gene expression (MIP-2/CXCL2, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1alpha/CCL3, MIP-1beta/CCL4) by Leishmania is NF-kappaB dependent, which implies that p35 RelA/p50 dimers are able to activate transcription, despite the absence of a recognized transcriptional transactivation domain. NF-kappaB cleavage was observed following infection with a range of pathogenic species, including L. donovani, L. major, L. mexicana, and L. (Viannia) braziliensis, but not the non-pathogenic L. tarentolae or treatment with IFN-gamma. These results indicate a novel mechanism by which a pathogen can subvert a macrophage's regulatory pathways to alter NF-kappaB activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".