Achievable Rate Region under Joint Distributed Beamforming and Power Allocation for Two-Way Relay Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We obtain the achievable beamforming rate region for a two-way cooperative network consisting of two transceivers and multiple relays, all single-antenna nodes. Assuming that the relay beamforming weights as well as the transceiver transmit powers are the design parameters, this region is characterized under a constraint on the total (network) transmit power consumption. Using the shape of the rate region, we then use a sum-rate maximization approach to obtain the jointly optimal relay beamforming weights and transceiver transmit powers. Interestingly, we show that the sum-rate maximization approach yields the same solution as the max-min fair design approach does. Using this relationship, we further present a semi-closed-form solution to the underlying distributed beamforming problem. We then prove that the transmit power of any of the two transceivers can be obtained as the solution to a one-dimensional optimization problem using a simple bisection method which enjoys a low computational complexity. Furthermore, we extend these results to obtain the relay beamforming weights and transceiver transmit powers corresponding to any point on the boundary of the rate region, through a weighted sum-rate maximization approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it