Les trajectoires de conversion écologique face aux enjeux économiques et sociaux du « logement durable » en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge les trajectoires de conversion écologique des modes de vie à travers un questionnement du logement en développement durable en France, et retient deux groupes cibles : les jeunes primo-accédants et les séniors, dans trois régions différentes. Par rapport aux programmes immobiliers axés sur le « durable » qui se développent à l’heure actuelle, et mettent fréquemment l’accent sur une dimension technique liée aux économies d’énergie, la recherche révèle la pluralité des dynamiques en jeu, en fonction d’une diversité de critères (matériaux de construction, équipements, évolutivité, esthétique, environnement et cadre de vie…). Ceci montre que le contenu du répertoire du « logement durable », à l’image de celui du développement durable plus largement, ne se réduit pas à un cadre unique et stabilisé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".