Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article souligne la présence de la diversité ethnoculturelle dans la société autant dans les dynamiques sociales que les manifestations artistiques. Elle interpelle donc la dimension éthique des rapports sociaux parce que la rencontre de l’Autre avec ses différences dites culturelles fait appel autant à la fascination qu’à la peur. Pourquoi ? Parce que la culture ne constitue pas un « en-soi » neutre, mais résulte de la conjugaison des rapports de force imposés par une classe dominante qui contrôle les mécanismes de développement de l’économie, des médias, des arts de masse, etc. En somme, la « gestion » des différences relève autant de déterminants systémiques que de phénomènes de perception générés par l’amalgame qui résulte de la confrontation entre la fascination et la peur de l’Autre. En guise de sortie de scène, l’article propose des éléments de réflexion pour les pratiques sociales et culturelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".