Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lipid oxidation products are present in unknown amounts in the food supply of industrialized societies. Evidence for a putative role of some of these compounds in accelerating events in the atherogenic process--the initiation of endothelial injury, the accumulation of plaque, and the termination phase of thrombosis--comes from both animal and human studies. Although metabolic and epidemiological studies in humans and animals generally support the concept that a higher intake of polyunsaturates is beneficial to lipoprotein metabolism and cardiovascular health, some findings suggest that a diet high in polyunsaturated fatty acids that are insufficiently protected by antioxidants, such as vitamin E, may carry a higher risk of atherosclerosis. Although gross pathological effects of ingestion of lipid oxidation products are unlikely in the human feeding situation, more subtle metabolic actions of these compounds on vitamin E status, platelet activity, and lipoprotein metabolism cannot yet be discounted. The presence of reactive lipid oxidation components in foods needs more systematic research in terms of the metabolic effects of these compounds and their occurrence in the usual diet, as well as the associated antioxidant requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".