MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051847070 · doi:10.1117/12.628626

Tunable photonic microwave filters based on all-optical mixing

2005· article· en· W2051847070 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Wang, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree spectral rangeOpticsMaterials scienceOptical filterRadio frequencySIGNAL (programming language)Laser linewidthFiber Bragg gratingFilter (signal processing)Optical Carrier transmission ratesMicrowaveOptoelectronicsIntensity modulationLaserPhysicsOptical fiberRadio over fiberPhase noiseTelecommunicationsPhase modulationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel approach to implementing an all-optical microwave filter that is suitable for direct deployment in a radio-over-fiber link. The proposed filter consists of a narrow linewidth laser source, two Mach-Zehnder electro-optic intensity modulators (MZM), a local RF signal source and a chirped fiber Bragg grating (CFBG). The light emitted from the laser source is externally intensity modulated by a driving RF signal (RF1), and then injected to a second electro-optic intensity modulator. The second intensity modulator is driven by a strong local RF signal (RF2), to produce a spectrum with a carrier and multiple sidebands. Thanks to the frequency mixing effect of the second intensity modulator, the RF signal carried by the optical source is transferred to the sidebands as well. By using a CFBG as a dispersive device to induce time delays for the carrier and the sidebands, an all-optical microwave filter with only a single light source, but multiple taps is realized. The tunability of the proposed filter can be achieved by adjusting the frequency of RF2. A 2-tap lowpass filter with a free spectral range (FSR) tunable from 2.1 GHz to 4.2 GHz, and a 3-tap lowpass filter with a free spectral range tunable from 4.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz are experimentally demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207