MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051868991 · doi:10.1109/tdc.2010.5484276

BC Hydro's experience on Voltage VAR Optimization in distribution system

2010· article· en· W2051868991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage reductionSmart gridMetering modeEnergy conservationVoltageVoltage regulationComputer scienceDistribution (mathematics)Load managementElectrical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BC Hydro is one of the leaders in the North America in the implementation of Voltage VAR Optimization (VVO) in distribution systems. Several VVO projects have been commissioned during the past 12 years resulting in improved voltage regulation, losses reduction and energy savings. BC Hydro's field experience with perspective for this advanced VVO Smart Grid application along its perspective on the integration of VVO with emerging technologies such as Distribution Management System (DMS) and Smart Metering & Infrastructure (SMI) is presented in this paper. VVO provides significant potential to optimize voltage and VAR resources as well as to meet energy efficiency and conservation targets of the power delivery systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207