MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051869536 · doi:10.3366/rom.2014.0194

The Variants and Transformations of <i>Fantasmagoriana:</i> Tracing a Travelling Text to the Byron–Shelley Circle

2014· article· en· W2051869536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRomanticism · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsSheridan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanLiteratureCONTESTImitationReading (process)ArtStorytellingPhilosophyNarrativePsychologyLinguisticsTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most famous episodes in English literary history, well-known to literary scholars and students alike, is the ghost-storytelling contest at the Villa Diodati in June 1816. It is often retold how Mary Shelley’s masterpiece Frankenstein (1818) found its genesis in the reading of German ghost stories which ‘excited in us [the Byron–Shelley circle] a playful desire of imitation’ to write one’s own ghost story (Shelley, 48). More than a decade later, in her introduction to the 1831 edition, Mary Shelley recalled that these inspirational German ghost stories were read in French.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it