MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051870700 · doi:10.1080/15538362.2011.630302

Impact of Training System on Fruit Composition and Sensory Attributes of Syrah in California's Dunnigan Hills

2011· article· en· W2051870700 on OpenAlex
David Sorokowsky, Andrew G. Reynolds

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Fruit Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBerryTitratable acidHorticultureLavenderAromaPepperPhenolsChemistryFood scienceBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Syrah’ vines in the Dunnigan Hills, California were trained to one of three canopy systems [Smart-Dyson (SD); southern sprawl (SS); full sprawl (FS)] over 3 years. The canopy system had little impact on yield components. The SS had the smallest berries in 2005, and in 2006, both SS and FS had the smallest berries. Soluble solids were highest in SS in 2005 and 2006 and lowest in FS in 2006. The SS had the highest berry titratable acidity (TA) in 2005 and 2006, FS had the highest TA in 2004 and the lowest in 2006, and SD had the lowest TA in 2004 and 2005. Color intensity was highest in SS in all 3 years and lowest in SD and FS in 2 of 3 vintages. In 2005, berry anthocyanins were highest in SS and lowest in FS. SD berries had the lowest phenols in all 3 years, with FS fruit having similar values in 2005 and 2006. SS berries had the highest phenols in 2005 and 2006. In 2005, SS wines had the highest blueberry and lavender aromas and lowest pepper and herbal aromas, along with the highest anise and lowest cherry flavors and lowest astringency. Wines from SD and FS were lowest for blueberry aromas and highest for herbal; SD was also lowest for lavender aroma. The FS wines had the highest cherry and lowest anise flavors. In 2006, SS wines were highest for lavender, black pepper, and blackberry aromas and weight. SD wines were equal to SS in blackberry, and highest for blueberry aromas. FS wines were the lowest for black pepper, blueberry, blackberry, and lavender aromas; blueberry, blackberry, and lavender flavors; weight and length; and most astringent. The SD system provided the lowest average maximum cluster temperature throughout the growing season, while the FS system experienced highest maximum cluster temperatures, which occasionally were >45°C. Data suggest that canopy systems that provide some degree of cluster shading with an accompanied reduction in cluster temperatures during the growing season might be beneficial in warm winegrowing regions in terms of improving wine sensory quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it