Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis peu, des colloques et des publications ont agité le monde de l’historiographie irlando-québécoise en y insufflant une vigueur nouvelle. Les recherches récentes se concentrent sur deux axes principaux : celui de la comparaison Irlande et Québec et celui des relations intranationales qui ont eu cours depuis les années 1820 entre Irlando-Québécois et Canadiens français. L’univers académique irlando-québécois est en voie de retoucher les thèses révisionnistes irlando-canadiennes — bien établies au Canada anglais depuis le début des années 1980 —, en plus de corriger certaines lacunes historiographiques au sujet du Québec. La première moitié de l’article tracera l’évolution de l’historiographie irlando-québécoise, justement en rapport avec celle du Canada anglais. La deuxième moitié, davantage portée sur les questions politiques, visera à éclairer le potentiel de ce champ académique encore en développement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".