MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Use of Satellite Imagery for Establishing Road Horizontal Alignments

2007· article· en· W2051874994 on OpenAlexaff
Said M. Easa, Haibin Dong, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surveying Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputationSimple (philosophy)SatelliteComputer visionImage (mathematics)Remote sensingDigital mappingArtificial intelligenceHorizontal and verticalSatellite imageryData miningAlgorithmGeodesyGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generating fast and inexpensive digital road maps and databases from high-resolution satellite imagery is becoming possible for various applications. This paper presents a new method for establishing road horizontal alignment using IKONOS 1m spatial resolution imagery. Road extraction algorithms were developed for two types of horizontal curves: Simple circular curves and reverse circular curves. The method requires only two and three unknown parameters for simple and reverse curves, respectively. Unlike existing methods of circle detection, the proposed method performs the search procedures in a much smaller area than the image size and achieves faster computations. The derived curve parameters represent useful inputs into a geographic information system database. The developed method has been tested using IKONOS images for simple and reverse curves. The results show that the proposed method converges in all cases and can be used for accurately establishing road horizontal curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surveying EngineeringSame topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207