The succinate:menaquinone reductase of Bacillus cereus — characterization of the membrane-bound and purified enzyme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Utilization of external succinate by Bacillus cereus and the properties of the purified succinate:menaquinone-7 reductase (SQR) were studied. Bacillus cereus cells showed a poor ability for the uptake of and respiratory utilization of exogenous succinate, thus suggesting that B. cereus lacks a specific succinate uptake system. Indeed, the genes coding for a succinate-fumarate transport system were missing from the genome database of B. cereus. Kinetic studies of membranes indicated that the reduction of menaquinone-7 is the rate-limiting step in succinate respiration. In accordance with its molecular characteristics, the purified SQR of B. cereus belongs to the type-B group of SQR enzymes, consisting of a 65-kDa flavoprotein (SdhA), a 29-kDa iron-sulphur protein (SdhB), and a 19-kDa subunit containing 2 b-type cytochromes (SdhC). In agreement with this, we could identify the 4 conserved histidines in the SdhC subunit predicted by the B. cereus genome database. Succinate reduced half of the cytochrome b content. Redox titrations of SQR-cytochrome b-557 detected 2 components with apparent midpoint potential values at pH 7.6 of 79 and -68 mV, respectively; the components were not spectrally distinguishable by their maximal absorption bands as those of Bacillus subtilis. The physiological properties and genome database analyses of B. cereus are consistent with the cereus group ancestor being an opportunistic pathogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".