MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051930242 · doi:10.1017/s0022377803002745

Transport of energetic charged particles. Part 2. Small-angle scattering

2004· article· en· W2051930242 on OpenAlexaff
E. Kh. Kaghashvili, G. P. Zank, J. Y. Lu, W. Dröge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plasma Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsBoltzmann equationScatteringMathematical analysisPolynomialInverse scattering transformSpherical harmonicsDiffusion equationPartial differential equationClassical mechanicsScattering theoryQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The propagating source method has been extended to solve the Boltzmann equation with a quasi-linear diffusion scattering operator. A half-range polynomial expansion method is used to reduce the integral-diffusion form of the ‘collisional’ Boltzmann equation to an infinite set of linear hyperbolic partial differential equations in the harmonics of the polynomial expansion. The lowest-order truncation of the coupled set of equations yields an inhomogeneous form of the well-known telegrapher equation, which, unlike the homogeneous telegrapher equation, does not introduce physically unrealistic pulse solutions. Anisotropic quasi-linear scattering models for which the index than for mirroring models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plasma PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207