Crop Modeling and the Identification of Stable Coefficients that May Reflect Significant Groups of Genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge about the functioning of a crop system can be embedded in simulation models of crop growth and development. Such quantitative models have until now made extensive use of physiological knowledge, but modeling could benefit greatly by incorporating genetic information. Equally, because models can help resolve environmentally varying characteristics into stable characteristics that reflect groups of genes, genomics research could benefit from modeling efforts. The use of the model Cropsim to analyze wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth and development is demonstrated. Data on reproductive development were well fitted when the life cycle was divided into phases, although photoperiodic sensitivity varied between phases. Describing leaf appearance satisfactorily required introducing an effect of photoperiod. Understanding the need for a breakdown into phases of development, for varying photoperiodic sensitivities, and for photoperiodic control of leaf appearance, could be enhanced by genomic studies. Simulating growth of wheat over successive seasons required changing supposedly stable genotypic characteristics. Furthermore, growth of near inbred lines incorporating the Lr19 chromosome translocation varied with genotypic background. These results also indicate that, given the variation in modeling outputs from year to year, care should be taken in the application of models to long‐term problems, and that efforts should be devoted to model improvement. Further development of crop models will benefit from associating genomic analysis with field experiments and model analyses. Much could be gained from increased interaction among model developers, field experimenters, and genomics researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".