Diffusion-limited kinetics of terrace growth on GaAs(110)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kinetics of thermal annealing of surface roughness created by low-energy ion bombardment of GaAs(110) is characterized in situ by a low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) spot profile analysis to investigate the underlying diffusion mechanisms involved. The coarsening of the step-and-terrace structure on the partially annealed surface is observed, showing power-law growth of the average terrace width $l\ensuremath{\sim}{t}^{\ensuremath{\beta}}$ with an exponent $\ensuremath{\beta}=0.23\ensuremath{-}0.26$ over two orders of magnitude in annealing time $t$ in the temperature range 660--740 K. However, the terrace height distribution is shown to vary little with annealing, providing evidence for an Ehrlich-Schwoebel barrier at step edges. The LEED analysis also detects an additional, low amplitude height distribution contributing an interface width of less than 0.03 nm, which is interpreted as elastic deformation around subsurface defects and exhibits much slower relaxation kinetics during annealing than the terrace growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it