MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O cotidiano institucional do Método Mãe Canguru na perspectiva dos profissionais de saúde

2011· article· pt· W2051970087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia & Sociedade · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographySociologyPower (physics)HumanitiesPolitical sciencePublic relationsPhilosophyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Método Mãe Canguru apresenta-se como uma política de humanização hospitalar. Este estudo analisou a dinâmica institucional que permeia o funcionamento do Método Mãe Canguru na perspectiva dos profissionais de saúde, a partir da perspectiva da Etnografia Institucional. A pesquisa mostrou que embora alguns profissionais se diferenciem no tratamento com as usuárias, a maioria deles desconsidera o papel ativo da mãe nesse método de intervenção, utilizando o poder institucional como forma de controle social para manter as mães desinformadas sobre a possibilidade de deixar a maternidade. Ressalta-se, assim, que a implantação desse programa requer não só o treinamento da equipe, devendo ser levado em consideração a complexidade social, econômica e emocional dos profissionais e as limitações estruturais do sistema de saúde pública.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it