O cotidiano institucional do Método Mãe Canguru na perspectiva dos profissionais de saúde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O Método Mãe Canguru apresenta-se como uma política de humanização hospitalar. Este estudo analisou a dinâmica institucional que permeia o funcionamento do Método Mãe Canguru na perspectiva dos profissionais de saúde, a partir da perspectiva da Etnografia Institucional. A pesquisa mostrou que embora alguns profissionais se diferenciem no tratamento com as usuárias, a maioria deles desconsidera o papel ativo da mãe nesse método de intervenção, utilizando o poder institucional como forma de controle social para manter as mães desinformadas sobre a possibilidade de deixar a maternidade. Ressalta-se, assim, que a implantação desse programa requer não só o treinamento da equipe, devendo ser levado em consideração a complexidade social, econômica e emocional dos profissionais e as limitações estruturais do sistema de saúde pública.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".