Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in a mouse model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although inhaled nitric oxide transiently improves oxygenation in patients with acute lung injury, it has not affected clinical outcomes. As well, the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on the pathophysiologic features of acute lung injury have not been well defined. Therefore, we assessed the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on the degree of pulmonary inflammation and injury in a mouse model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory of an academic institution. SUBJECTS: Male C57Bl/6 mice. INTERVENTIONS: Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and perforation. At the time of surgery, septic and naïve mice were randomized to exposure to either 40 ppm inhaled nitric oxide or room air for 24 hrs before they were killed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sepsis-induced acute lung injury was characterized by increased pulmonary myeloperoxidase (68 +/- 13 vs. 13 +/- 3 mU/mg protein in naïve mice, p <.01), pulmonary 8-isoprostane content (627 +/- 51 vs. 88 +/- 20 pg/mg protein in naïve mice, p <.01), and protein in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (p <.05). Inhaled nitric oxide exposure in septic mice completely abrogated the septic increases in myeloperoxidase activity (p <.05) and pulmonary 8-isoprostane content (p <.05) but had no effect on bronchoalveolar lavage protein. The induction of sepsis also was associated with an increase in pulmonary inducible NO synthase activity (2.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.1 pmol small middle dotmin-1 small middle dotmg-1 protein in naïve mice, p <.05), and inhaled nitric oxide attenuated this increase in pulmonary inducible NO synthase activity (p <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to inhaled nitric oxide early in the course of sepsis-induced acute lung injury is associated with reduced pulmonary leukocyte infiltration and less oxidative injury. Decreased lung inflammation and injury with inhaled nitric oxide is associated with decreased pulmonary inducible NO synthase activity. Therefore, inhaled NO may have greater clinical benefit if administered earlier in the natural history of acute lung injury in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".