MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051987640 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.012503

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>NMR study of single crystals of the heavily overdoped pnictide superconductors<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ba</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>As</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>and 1)

2010· article· lv· W2051987640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsKnight shiftCondensed matter physicsDopingRelaxation (psychology)Type (biology)Scaling lawCrystallographyScalingSuperconductivityChemistryGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed $^{75}\text{A}\text{s}$ NMR studies on two overdoped high-quality ${\text{Ba}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\text{K}}_{x}{\text{Fe}}_{2}{\text{As}}_{2}$ ($x=0.7$ and 1.0) single crystals. In the normal states, we found a dramatic increase in the spin-lattice relaxation $(1/{^{75}T}_{1})$ from the $x=0.7$ to the $x=1.0$ samples. In ${\text{KFe}}_{2}{\text{As}}_{2}$, the ratio of $1/{^{75}T}_{1}T{K}_{n}^{2}$, where ${^{75}K}_{n}$ is the Knight shift, increases as temperature drops. These results indicate the existence of another type of spin fluctuations in ${\text{KFe}}_{2}{\text{As}}_{2}$ which is accustomed to being treated as a simple Fermi liquid. In the superconducting state, the temperature scalings of $1/{^{75}T}_{1}$ below ${T}_{c}$ in the overdoped samples are significantly different from those in the under or optimally doped ones. A power-law scaling behavior $1/{^{75}T}_{1}T\ensuremath{\sim}{T}^{0.5}$ is observed, which indicates universal strong low-energy excitations in the overdoped hole-type superconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.014
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0180.017
Research integrity0.0150.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8160.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it