Lattice Parameter and Sintering Temperature Dependence of Bulk and Grain-Boundary Conduction of Garnet-like Solid Li-Electrolytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dependence of the bulk and grain-boundary lithium-ion conduction on the lattice parameter by substitution of trivalent La by divalent Mg, Ca, Sr, , or Ba and monovalent Li in garnet-like , and the effect of sintering temperature were investigated. The ionic bulk conductivity increases with increasing ionic radius of the divalent alkaline earth ion and corresponding increased lattice parameter. An exception is Mg, which is too small for replacing La and forms a second phase. The lattice parameter is also found to increase with increased sintering temperature, except for the mixed substituted sample. The Ca, Sr, , and Ba compounds show mainly bulk resistances with minor boundary contribution at room temperature, which decreases with increasing size of the alkaline earth ion. In contrast, the multiphase Mg-substituted sample exhibits an appreciable grain-boundary contribution to the total resistance. Microstructural investigations indicate the dependence of the grain-boundary resistance on the grain size, sinterability, and formation of transient or steady-state phase boundary compositions, which are caused by different chemical diffusion coefficients of the components. This is related to the higher conductivities of and annealed at compared to samples annealed at .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".