4q12–4q21.21 deletion genotype–phenotype correlation and the absence of piebaldism in presence of <i>KIT</i> haploinsufficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromosome 4q deletion syndrome is a rare intellectual disability disorder caused by a variety of non-recurrent deletions of 4q. We describe the evolution of the phenotypic features of a female patient with a previously unreported deletion of 4q12-4q21.21 (hg 18; 54,711,575-79,601,919). By review reported individuals with interstitial deletions extending telomeric from 4q12 have syndromic intellectual disability with variable piebaldism. We expand the phenotype to include dolichocephaly, pectus excavatum, hip dysplasia, pes planus, myopia, lens opacities, and an absence of spoken language but not of communication through sign. The proposita also did not have piebaldism suggesting again that piebaldism arises from a mechanism more complex than simple haploinsufficiency of KIT. Comparing deletions among affected individuals localizes the critical interval within 4q12-4q13.1, although the absence of molecular boundaries for nearly all reported cases precludes precise delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".