MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052098134 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2011.22488

Improving the Patient Experience through Design

2011· article· en· W2052098134 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brian Golden, Rosemary Hannam, Heather Fraser, Sarah Downey, Janice Stewart, Eugene Grichko

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Imaging in Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandatePatient experienceBest practiceWork (physics)MedicineHealth careNursingPatient careSpace (punctuation)Medical educationPublic relationsManagementPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toronto's Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) received a major financial gift to redesign its chemotherapy daycare and transfusion facilities, which were over capacity and in need of improvement, both functionally and aesthetically. PMH's vision was to create a new space and experience that was truly patient centric and world class. Meanwhile, a research team at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management had also received a gift from a corporate donor with a patient-focused mandate to examine ways in which healthcare in Canada could be made more patient centric. The Rotman research team was invited to work with the hospital's staff, physicians, patients and families to explore a more patient-centered approach to care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicDigital Imaging in MedicineFrench-language works237,207