MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052113568 · doi:10.1017/s0012162205000514

Visual development in preterm infants

2005· review· en· W2052113568 on OpenAlex
Ashima Madan, James E. Jan, William V. Good

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preterm birth can affect many neurological functions and is known to affect vision when damage to the visual cortex or optic radiations occurs. However, it is not known whether extreme preterm birth affects visual development, either favorably or unfavorably. Additional time in an extrauterine environment could conceivably allow the acceleration of visual abilities as a result of additional experience. Although recent studies suggest that even apparently healthy preterm infants may suffer some degree of loss of neurological function. In this paper we describe what is known about visual development in preterm infants, and we make the case that additional studies are needed to clarify the impact of preterm birth on vision. Because the visual system now lends itself to quantitative studies of function, it could offer researchers and clinicians a method of detecting subtle effects of preterm birth on neurological development and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it