MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2052120668 · doi:10.1139/l01-028

Assessment of short-HRT, on-line, fixed-film prefermentation of domestic wastewater for enhanced biological phosphorus removal

2001· article· en· W2052120668 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Donald S. Mavinic, Venkatram Mahendraker, Barry Rabinowitz, Alexandru C. Dumitrescu, Frederic A. Koch, James Barnard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEffluentWastewaterCloggingPhosphorusSewage treatmentPulp and paper industryEnhanced biological phosphorus removalSewageRaw materialEnvironmental scienceChemistryEnvironmental engineeringActivated sludgeEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, pilot-scale, on-line, short-HRT fixed-film prefermenter systems were evaluated using Ringlace and Kaldnes fixed-film media for short chain volatile fatty acid (SCVFA) production, with screened raw domestic wastewater and primary effluent. In comparison to the control reactors without media, significant levels of SCVFA were generated in the fixed-film prefermenters. For the design considered in this study, the Ringlace media performed well, whereas the Kaldnes media resulted in clogging. The Ringlace media data show that, for a 60-min HRT, on-line prefermenter systems produced 11 and 5.5 mg/L of SCVFA (as acetic acid) with screened raw wastewater and primary effluent, respectively. Such a low HRT might translate into potential cost savings (up to 25%) in providing SCVFA to enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) plants and could lead to a completely new generation of prefermenter designs.Key words: domestic sewage, enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems, fixed film, prefermenter, short chain volatile fatty acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering→Same topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal→French-language works237,207→