MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052137180 · doi:10.1109/icc.2014.6883889

Energy-efficient downlink transmission in two-tier network MIMO OFDMA networks

2014· article· en· W2052137180 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Hamdi Sakr, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEfficient energy useTelecommunications linkMacrocellFemtocellBase stationSubcarrierOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessTransmitter power outputBeamformingMIMOTransmission (telecommunications)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMathematical optimizationComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringTransmitterElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose an energy-efficient resource allocation scheme for downlink transmission in two-tier Network MIMO OFDMA-based macrocell-femtocell networks where the femto-cells form clusters of equal size. The proposed scheme uses a joint zero-forcing beamforming with semi-orthogonal user selection (ZFBF-SUS) transmission at each network tier to perform allocation of subcarrier and precoding coefficients. Then, power allocation is optimized in order to maximize the total system energy efficiency (i.e., average number of successfully transmitted bits per energy unit [bit/Joule], or equivalently, the average data rate per unit power [bps/Watt]). The macro base stations (MBSs) and the femto base stations (FBSs) in a cluster maximize their energy efficiency in a distributed manner while considering the cross-tier interference and the capacity limitations of backhaul links. The problem of maximizing energy efficiency is formulated as a fractional program and solved by using the Dinkelbach iterative algorithm. Numerical results show that the proposed scheme outperforms the scheme that maximizes the system average capacity, in terms of energy efficiency, and also improves the total system performance in terms of energy efficiency and average system capacity when compared to a single-tier system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207