MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel Applications for Biomaterials: The Case of Remediation of Wine Taints Using Poly-Lactic Acid Polymer

2015· article· en· W2052251761 on OpenAlexaff
Andreea Botezatu, Gary J. Pickering

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineBiopolymerLactic acidChemistryFood scienceChromatographyMass spectrometryPolymerBacteriaOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wine is the world’s oldest alcoholic beverage and the most consumed in at least 20 countries. However, taints detract from its quality and acceptance, significantly reducing the value of wine. In this study we investigated the capacity of a poly-lactic acid (PLA) biopolymer to reduce concentrations of four odorants responsible for tainting many red wines: i so propyl-methoxypyrazine (IPMP), iso butyl–methoxypyrazine (IBMP), 4-ethylphenol (4-EP) and 4-ethylguaiacol (4-EG). Red wine was spiked with either IPMP [20 ng/L] and IBMP [20 ng/L] (Study 1) or 4-EP [200 ug/L] and 4-EG [200 ug/L] (Study 2) and then treated with a PLA film [surface area 350 cm 2 /L]. Solid Phase Micro-Extraction Multi-Dimensional Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry were used to measure the methoxypyrazines and ethylphenols, respectively, both before and after treatment with PLA. Results showed significant reductions in all of the target odorants after 8hrs treatment: IPMP (51%), IBMP (26%), 4-EP (21%) and 4-EG (20%). Taken overall, the data suggest potential for the use of PLA in treating common wine faults, particularly ‘ladybug taint’, which is caused by elevated levels of IPMP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207