MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052284683 · doi:10.1002/ctpp.200900048

Experimental Study of the Effect of Poloidal Flow on Stability of Magnetic Islands in LHD and TJ‐II

2010· article· en· W2052284683 on OpenAlex
Y. Narushima, F. Castejón, K.Y. Watanabe, S. Sakakibara, T. Estrada, F. Medina, D. Löpez‐Bruna, M. Yokoyama, K. Ida, LHD Experiment Group

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Plasma Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsDiamagnetismLarge Helical DeviceMagnetic fieldFlow (mathematics)PlasmaPhysicsIonElectric fieldAtomic physicsCondensed matter physicsMechanicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effect of the poloidal flow on the magnetic island is studied. The self‐healing of the magnetic island has been observed in the Large Helical Device (LHD) and TJ‐II. In TJ‐II plasmas, the magnetic island is healed in case the radial electric field is positive. In the LHD experiment, on the other hand, the radial electric field is negative when the magnetic island is healed. The relation between the magnitudes of the E × B flow and ion diamagnetic flow is important to consider the effect of the poloidal flow on magnetic island (© 2010 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it