MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Tropical Remnants on Extratropical Cyclogenesis: Case Study of Hurricanes Danielle and Earl (1998)

2004· article· en· W2052320369 on OpenAlexaff
Ron McTaggart‐Cowan, John R. Gyakum, M. K. Yau

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaroclinityClimatologyExtratropical cycloneTropical cycloneTropical cyclogenesisGeologyCyclogenesisPotential vorticityStormAtmospheric sciencesTropopauseEnvironmental scienceTroposphereCyclone (programming language)VorticityMeteorologyOceanographyVortexGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of remnant tropical cyclone (TC) circulation and moisture structures is investigated for a simultaneous extratropical transition (ET) event involving ex-Hurricanes Danielle and Earl (September 1998). Although both storms undergo prolonged periods of reintensification following ET, the forcings involved in each of their redevelopment processes differ fundamentally. A review of the tropical and baroclinic ET modes in the North Atlantic stresses the importance of jet/front structures to the nature of the reintensification process. Ex-Hurricane Danielle begins to redevelop in the eastern half of the basin in the downstream, poleward sector of an intensifying polar jet. The system undergoes a tropical mode of reintensification, resulting in a troposphere-deep warm environment surrounding the storm, devoid of near-surface fronts and maintained by strong tropopause folds at its periphery. Ex-Hurricane Earl reintensifies near the eastern seaboard according to a baroclinic mode, under the influence of an upshear upper-level trough. A rapid cyclonic rollup of upper-level potential vorticity over the reintensifying low-level center results in a strong baroclinic system with well-defined frontal boundaries. The two elements of the remnant TCs considered here are circulation and moisture. Potential vorticity-based modifications are made to the initial atmospheric state of the Mesoscale Compressible Community model in order to remove either one or both of these possible cyclogenetic forcings. The resulting set of sensitivity tests is analyzed in terms of system intensity and structure. It is found that the tropical-mode reintensification (ex-Hurricane Danielle) process requires the presence of the remnant's circulation and moisture for rapid redevelopment. However, the baroclinic-mode transition studied (ex-Hurricane Earl) is remarkably insensitive to the removal of the ex-tropical vorticity and moisture structures of the TC remnant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207