Intermediate-Dose Methotrexate and Intravenous 6-Mercaptopurine Chemotherapy for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Did Not Respond to Initial Induction Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the complete remission rate of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who were not induced into remission by initial therapy, when subsequently treated with intermediate-dose methotrexate and intravenous 6-mercaptopurine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with B-precursor ALL who did not achieve initial remission after 4 or 6 weeks of standard three- or four-drug induction chemotherapy were entered on study. Therapy consisted of three doses at weekly intervals of methotrexate 1,000 mg/m2 over 24 hours followed by 6-mercaptopurine 1,000 mg/m2 over 8 hours 20 minutes. Patients achieving a partial remission could receive two additional weekly courses of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine. Initially, patients received weekly intrathecal chemotherapy, but the study was amended to include intrathecal therapy only at week 1. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered on study. All were evaluable for toxicity and response. There were seven complete remissions, four partial remissions, six patients with no response, and two children with progressive disease, for an overall complete remission rate of 37%. One patient was removed from the study after the second course of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine because of renal failure. Two patients had neurologic toxicity resulting in a study amendment. No patients subsequently experienced neurologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate and intravenous 6-mercaptopurine can induce remission in some patients with ALL who experience initial induction failure. Features predicting complete remission, however, could not be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".