MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052326797 · doi:10.7453/gahmj.2015.049

Integrative Nursing around the Globe

2015· article· en· W2052326797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Jo Kreitzer

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Advances in Health and Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobeNursingHealth professionalsNursing researchHealth careHealthcare systemMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nurses and other healthcare professionals from around the world are meeting May 18 to 20, 2015, in Reykjavik, Iceland, for the first International Symposium on Integrative Nursing (http://integrativenursing2015.is/en). Attendees from Finland, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Canada, the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and the United States are gathering to explore how integrative nursing is being implemented in various settings and with diverse patient populations. Presentations will focus on characteristics of successful integrative health programs as well as the emerging research agenda underlying integrative nursing. A major focus is on strategies to improve the health and wellbeing of caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Advances in Health and MedicineSame topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsFrench-language works237,207