MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052352916 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3504359

Survol Hydrogéologique de l’Aquifère Transfrontalier du Bassin Versant de la Rivière Châteauguay, Canada - États Unis

2010· article· fr· W2052352916 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Miroslav Nastev, Charles Lamontagne

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedBedrockHydrogeologyAquiferGroundwaterWater resource managementHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGroundwater flowEnvironmental scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This regional hydrogeological study of the Chateauguay River watershed was undertaken during a four-year period, between 2003 and 2007, and required the involvement of several multidisciplinary groups. The rationale for the study was the lack of knowledge on the state of the groundwater resource, which hindered management efforts in the watershed. The project objective was to define the major aquifer units and the quality and quantity of the groundwater resources. The applied methodology consisted of compiling existing data and generating a digital database, acquiring new field data, and updating geological maps, followed by determining the hydrodynamic and hydrogeochemical processes, and assessing the sustainability. The regional aquifer units are comprised of sedimentary bedrock formations and occasional coarse fluvioglacial sediments. The nature and thickness of the surficial deposits defines the hydrogeological settings and flow regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207