MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052357223 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.i.01782

Provision of Orthopaedic Workforce and Implications for Access to Orthopaedic Services in Ontario

2011· article· en· W2052357223 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth M. Badley, Mayilée Cañizares, Nizar N. Mahomed, Paula Veinot, Aileen M. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubspecialtyWorkforceOrthopedic surgeryPopulationHealth careFamily medicineEnvironmental healthSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The aging population and increasing obesity rates will increase the prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions. Reports of orthopaedic surgeon shortages raise concerns about the ability of the health-care system to meet current and future demand in orthopaedics. A survey of all orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario, Canada, was carried out in 2006 to (1) update provision estimates of orthopaedic surgeons; (2) examine practice characteristics and perceived barriers to service; and (3) relate geographic availability of surgeons to population utilization of office-based and surgical orthopaedic services. METHODS: A two-part questionnaire was sent to all orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario in 2006. Provision data in hours per week and full-time equivalents and practice patterns were analyzed by health region. Population-based data on the use of orthopaedic services were obtained from health service administrative databases. RESULTS: There were 396 practicing orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario in 2006, equivalent to 2.43 full-time equivalents per 100,000 population, a finding similar to surveys in 1997 and 2000. Most surgeons were male, with a mean age of forty-nine years, with mainly adult practices; 48% reported having a subspecialty. Provision varied across Ontario, with an average of 112 hours per week of direct clinical time per 100,000 population (50% in the office, 30% in the operating room, 20% working on call). Many surgeons also reported time for administration, teaching, and research. Most respondents reported barriers to timely surgery, notably a lack of resources (operating room time, anesthesia, nursing, and/or bed capacity). Low orthopaedic provision was associated with lower utilization of office-based and surgical services, after controlling for neighborhood income and type of residence (urban or rural). CONCLUSIONS: Shortages and geographic variation in the supply of surgeons mean that access to care continues to be a challenge in Ontario. In regions with fewer surgeons, residents are more likely to be deprived of office-based services, potentially affecting access to surgery and to orthopaedic expertise. In light of a potential shortage of surgeons, alternative methods of service provision may be needed to respond to the aging of the baby boomer population and an anticipated growth in the demand for surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207