MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052381626 · doi:10.1190/1.1817148

A robust algorithm for constant‐Q wavelet estimation using Gabor analysis

2002· article· en· W2052381626 on OpenAlexaffabout
J.P. Grossman, Gary F. Margravé, Michael P. Lamoureux, Rita Aggarwala

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletGabor waveletConstant (computer programming)Computer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Wavelet transformMathematicsDiscrete wavelet transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002A robust algorithm for constant‐Q wavelet estimation using Gabor analysisAuthors: Jeff. P. GrossmanGary F. MargraveMichael P. LamoureuxRita AggarwalaJeff. P. GrossmanUniversity of Calgary, Gary F. MargraveUniversity of Calgary, Michael P. LamoureuxUniversity of Calgary, and Rita AggarwalaUniversity of Calgaryhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817148 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817148FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2002 Pages: 2478 publication data© 2002 Copyright © 2002 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Jeff. P. Grossman, Gary F. Margrave, Michael P. Lamoureux, and Rita Aggarwala, (2002), "A robust algorithm for constant‐Q wavelet estimation using Gabor analysis," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 2210-2213. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817148 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207