Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Placenta previa occurs in approximately 1 of every 200 pregnancies. No research examining women's experiences of this condition has been published. The objective of this study was to describe the experience of women hospitalized with placenta previa. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using a convenience sample of 10 pregnant women who had been hospitalized with placenta previa. Women were recruited from a tertiary care hospital and participated in two semistructured interviews during the pregnancy and one after the baby's birth while in hospital. They were admitted to hospital from 28 weeks' gestation and remained in hospital until delivery, generally at 36 weeks' gestation. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using content analysis to describe their experience. RESULTS: Six themes were identified from the descriptions of the experience as related by the participants. They encompassed the experience from the first symptoms to feelings about the experience after the baby was born. CONCLUSIONS: Women with placenta previa experience significant stressors while in hospital. Health caregivers should be aware of the loss of control and isolation these women feel and be mindful of the potential for sequelae in the postpartum period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".