MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Waiting For Something to Happen: Hospitalization with Placenta Previa

2001· article· en· W2052412321 on OpenAlex
Anne Katz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirth · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlacenta previaMedicineObstetricsFeelingPregnancyGestationPlacentaPsychologyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Placenta previa occurs in approximately 1 of every 200 pregnancies. No research examining women's experiences of this condition has been published. The objective of this study was to describe the experience of women hospitalized with placenta previa. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using a convenience sample of 10 pregnant women who had been hospitalized with placenta previa. Women were recruited from a tertiary care hospital and participated in two semistructured interviews during the pregnancy and one after the baby's birth while in hospital. They were admitted to hospital from 28 weeks' gestation and remained in hospital until delivery, generally at 36 weeks' gestation. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using content analysis to describe their experience. RESULTS: Six themes were identified from the descriptions of the experience as related by the participants. They encompassed the experience from the first symptoms to feelings about the experience after the baby was born. CONCLUSIONS: Women with placenta previa experience significant stressors while in hospital. Health caregivers should be aware of the loss of control and isolation these women feel and be mindful of the potential for sequelae in the postpartum period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it