Compensatory responses of protein import and transcription factor expression in mitochondrial DNA defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Defects in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evoke distinctive responses in the nuclear genome, leading to altered mitochondrial biogenesis. We used C(2)C(12) cells depleted of mtDNA (rho(-) cells) and fibroblasts from a mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes (MELAS) patient to examine adaptations of the protein import machinery and transcription factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis. In rho(-) cells, Tom20 and Tim23 protein levels were reduced by 25% and 59%, whereas mtHSP70 was induced by twofold relative to control cells. These changes were accompanied by a 21% increase in enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) import into mitochondria in rho(-) cells (P < 0.05). In contrast, in MELAS cells mtHSP70 was elevated by 70%, whereas Tom20 and Tom34 protein levels were increased by 45% and 112% relative to control values. EYFP import was not altered in MELAS cells. In rho(-) cells, protein levels of the transcription factors nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1) and transcription factor A (Tfam) declined by 33% and 54%, whereas no change was observed for the coactivator peroxisome proliferator receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha). In contrast, Tfam was increased by 40% in MELAS cells. Rho(-) cells displayed reduced oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) and ATP levels, along with a twofold increase in lactate levels (P < 0.05). In electrically stimulated C(2)C(12) cells, 109%, 78%, 60%, and 67% increases were observed in mtDNA, Vo(2), cytochrome-c oxidase (COX) activity, and Tom34 levels, respectively (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that compensatory adaptations occurred to maintain normal rates of protein import in response to mtDNA defects and support a role for contractile activity in reducing pathophysiology associated with mtDNA depletion. Because the expression of nuclear-encoded transcription factors and protein import machinery components was dependent on the type of mtDNA defect, these findings suggest involvement of distinct signaling cascades, each dependent on the type of mitochondrial defect, resulting in divergent changes in nuclear gene expression patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".