Resistivity measurements as a tool for outlining quick-clay extent and valley-fill stratigraphy: a feasibility study from Buvika, central Norway
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thick, marine clay deposits in valleys along the Norwegian coast are occasionally subjected to large landslides involving quick clay. Detailed mapping of the extent of quick clay is of great interest for planning and protection purposes, as the position of quick clay within slopes has a major impact on the landslide risk. Ground conditions in the small valley of Buvika, mid-Norway, are characterized by thick occurrences of quick clay, which are documented in numerous geotechnical investigations. The resistivity method is potentially well suited for outlining pockets of quick clay since quick clay has a slightly higher electric resistivity (10–80 Ωm) than intact unleached clay (1–10 Ωm). This is due to a higher salt content in the latter. These relations are supported in this study by pore-water salt content measurements. The acquired resistivity profiles are compared with other geophysical data and geotechnical drilling information. Results are promising, and acquired resistivity profiles are interpreted in terms of quick-clay extents, stratigraphy, bedrock influence, and groundwater drainage patterns. Mismatch between intersecting resistivity profiles may be an indication of local geological variations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it