MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2052422678 · doi:10.1109/icuwb.2015.7324490

Opportunistic Scheduling in Downlink Multiple-Antenna AF Interfered Networks

2015· article· en· W2052422678 on OpenAlexaff
Imène Trigui, Imen Mechmeche, Sofiène Affes, Alex Stéphenne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRayleigh fadingTelecommunications linkComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)RelayDistributed antenna systemFadingWirelessMoment-generating functionAntenna (radio)Electronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Computer networkChannel (broadcasting)Mathematical optimizationProbability density functionTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, multiuser multiple-antenna (MUMIMO) relay networks employing opportunistic scheduling and operating in the presence of rayleigh fading and co-channel interference are analyzed Notwithstanding the system complexity, due to the newly found complementary moment generating function transform (CMGF) operator, an exact expression for the capacity under general conditions is obtained. Moreover, driven by the fact that communication devices have grown much faster than the infrastructure relay support, a specific wireless setup, which consists of a large number of users K and a relatively small antenna number is investigated. Simulation results indicate a rather fast convergence to the asymptotic limits with the system's size, thereby demonstrating the practical importance of the scaling results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→