CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE ORAL IRON CHELATOR DEFERIPRONE FOR THE POTENTIAL TREATMENT OF IRON OVERLOAD IN BIRD SPECIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinical use of oral Fe chelators for the treatment of Fe-storage disease in birds requires evaluation. In this study, the efficacy of the Fe chelator deferiprone in reducing hepatic Fe stores, its effects on hematologic, biochemical, and plasma Fe parameters, and its potential toxicity during a 30-day treatment period were investigated in a controlled setting using two model species, the white leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus f. domestica) and the domestic pigeon (Columba livia). A second phase of the study investigated deferiprone-related Fe elimination in the excreta. Deferiprone, administered orally at a dosage of 50 mg/kg twice daily to birds that had been experimentally Fe loaded, significantly reduced hepatic Fe concentrations compared with levels in Fe-loaded and non-Fe-loaded controls. There were no significant alterations in routine clinical hematologic or biochemical parameters, although decreased transferrin saturation was noted in both species. Side effects associated with deferiprone administration were decreased weight gain and significant decreases in plasma Zn concentrations. No mortalities occurred in the pigeons, but there were three deaths in the deferiprone-treated group of Fe-loaded chickens, most likely associated with acute reduction of Fe required for normal enzymatic processes. Histologic changes associated with deferiprone treatment were not noted. Deferiprone caused a dose-dependent increase of Fe in the excreta at oral dosages of 50 and 75 mg/kg once daily in both species. Deferiprone is a promising, orally active Fe chelator for the treatment of Fe overload in birds, although its potential side effects need to be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".