Reliability Evaluation of a Wind Power Delivery System Using an Approximate Wind Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The power generated by a wind turbine generator depends mainly on the wind speed, and varies randomly with time. It could be very useful from a practical application point of view if an approximate wind power generation model can be developed, which is relatively simple to use in a reliability study, and requires relatively little wind data for the site of interest. Large wind farms are installed in locations with good wind resources, and they need to be connected to a power system grid. This paper presents a simplified wind speed model that can generate wind speed probability distributions for multiple wind farm sites if their annual mean wind speed and standard deviation values are known. The developed wind speed model can be combined with the wind turbine generator characteristics to obtain a simplified wind farm generation model that can be further modified to incorporate the effect of the transmission line on wind power delivery. The results from reliability studies on a test system are presented. The effects on the system reliability of different system parameters, such as the system load levels, and the size and length of the transmission line are analyzed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it