Unilateral Nodular Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis: Recurrence of an Experiment of Nature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The case of a 60-year-old diabetic patient with a fully developed diabetic glomerulosclerosis in one kidney, but only ischemic lesions in the contralateral one, which was 'protected' by a renal artery stenosis, is presented. The only other report of such a peculiar observation was made by Berkman and Rifkin on a patient who died in 1940. Because of the rather high incidence of diabetes and of renal artery stenosis, the scarcity of this 'experiment of nature' is astonishing and can be barely explained by a precise timing of the two pathological conditions. Despite rather detailed information on the clinical and paraclinical evolution of the present patient, the exact sequence of events could not be determined with certitude. Both cases bring a strong support for the role of glomerular hyperperfusion-hypertension in the pathogenesis and evolution of diabetic nephropathy and provide a theoretical basis for the importance of keeping the arterial pressure low in diabetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".