(Re)penser les relations constitutives de la gouvernance néolibérale : Quelques pistes de réflexion féministes pour les relations internationales et le droit international
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les enjeux théoriques et métathéoriques de l’analyse des principales dynamiques politiques et économiques de la gouvernance néolibérale en considérant les contributions de perspectives féministes à cette réflexion. Il s’intéresse tout particulièrement à la problématisation des dimensions genrées et racialisées de la transformation des processus de reproduction sociale dans ce contexte. Nous approfondissons ces considérations en insistant sur la densité de ces relations de pouvoir et, en conséquence, sur l’importance de reconnaître que les relations de genre ne sont pas constituées en abstraction de l’ensemble des autres dynamiques de pouvoir en jeu. Nous soutenons, au contraire, que celles-ci sont constitutives de ces transformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".