Synthesis and Properties of a Germanium(II) Metalloheterocycle Derived from 1,8-Di(isopropylamino)naphthalene. A Novel Ligand Leading to Formation of Ni{Ge[(<sup>i</sup>PrN)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>6</sub>]}<sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel mononuclear germylene, Ge[1,8-((i)PrN)(2)C(10)H(6)] (1), was isolated as a stable crystalline solid by the reaction of Li(2)[1,8-((i)PrN)(2)C(10)H(6)] with GeCl(2)(1,4-dioxane). Structural examination of 1 shows that this compound possesses a planar six-membered heterocyclic ring system with a Ge(II) center and that the steric impact of the substituents on the nitrogen centers is greater than that for the related five-membered metalloheterocycles. Compound 1 is readily oxidized with elemental S and Se and the structural details for the dinuclear product [[1,8-((i)PrN)(2)C(10)H(6)]Ge(micro-S)](2) are reported. Furthermore, the lone pair of electrons on the Ge(II) center in 1 allows this species to function as a novel ligand for the preparation of the unique tetrakis(germylene) complex Ni[Ge[((i)PrN)(2)C(10)H(6)]](4) (4). The structural features of 4 are reported and show that the germylene ligand, when coordinated to the Ni(0) center, now exhibited a twisted (nonplanar) heterometallocycle and a cone angle of 145 degrees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".