MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052442850 · doi:10.1063/1.1536618

No “delayed” muonium-formation in organic liquids

2003· article· en· W2052442850 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Walker, S. Karolczak, Gerald B. Porter, Hugh A. Gillis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuoniumDiamagnetismMuonMicrosecondChemistryThermalisationMoleculeChemical physicsAtomic physicsPhotochemistryMagnetic fieldNuclear physicsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of the yields of muonium atoms and diamagnetic-species in hexane in the presence of added scavengers have shown, unequivocally, that muonium is not formed by the “delayed” (microsecond) mechanism proposed recently. Instead, the lifetimes evaluated show that if the combination reaction of μ++e−→Mu contributes to muonium formation in “chemically active” liquids, then it is complete within <10−10 s. In fact the results are consistent only with the “hot” model, in which the initial distribution of muons between muonium atoms and diamagnetic molecules is determined at the epithermal level, as the last step of the muon’s charge-exchangecycles and thermalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMuon and positron interactions and applicationsFrench-language works237,207