MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052479494 · doi:10.3109/13506120309041728

Amyloidogenesis: historical and modern observations point to heparan sulfate proteoglycans as a major culprit

2003· review· en· W2052479494 on OpenAlex
John B. Ancsin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmyloid · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerlecanFibrillogenesisAgrinHeparan sulfateChemistryFibrilAmyloid (mycology)AmyloidosisBiochemistryProteoglycanCell biologyBiophysicsBiologyExtracellular matrixGlycosaminoglycanReceptorMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyloids are complex tissue deposits and each type is identified by one of 22 different proteins or peptides which become re-folded into non-native conformational intermediates and then assemble into fibrils of a highly regular structure. All amyloid deposits also contain apolipoprotein E (apoE) as well as the basement membrane (BM) components, serum amyloid P and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), perlecan or agrin. These BM components likely contribute to the overall organization of amyloid fibrils and HSPG has been further implicated in the genesis of amyloid. A growing body of evidence, summarized in this review, suggests that heparan sulfate (HS) promotes fibrillogenesis by associating with the amyloid precursors and inducing the conformational change required for their assembly into fibrils. HS also remains associated with the nascent fibrils contributing to its stability. These activities of HS are likely mediated through specific binding sites on the precursor proteins which appear to have sequence characteristics that are unique to amyloid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it