MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052486014 · doi:10.1139/o09-005

Establishment and characterization of a fibroblast cell line derived from Texel sheep

2009· article· en· W2052486014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linfeng Li, Weijun J. Guan, Han Li, Xueyan Z. Zhou, HU Yue-hui

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTexelFibroblastCharacterization (materials science)Cell cultureLine (geometry)BiologyCell biologyChemistryAnatomyAnimal scienceMathematicsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyGeneticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Texel sheep ear marginal tissue fibroblast cell line (named TSF19) was successfully established by using a primary explant technique and cell cryoconservation technology. TSF19 cells were adherent, with a population doubling time of 24.9 h. Chromosome analysis showed that >90% of cells were diploid prior to cell passage 4. Isoenzyme analyses of lactate dehydrogenase and malate dehydrogenase showed that the TSF19 cells had no cross-contamination with other species. Tests for cell line contamination with bacteria, fungi, or mycoplasmas were also negative. Plasmids encoding the fluorescent proteins pEGFP-N3, pECFP-N1, pDsRed1-N1, and pEYFP-N1 were transfected into cells to study exogenous gene expression in the cells. The plasmid transfection efficiency was between 21.8% and 46.5%. This newly established cell line will not only preserve the genetic resources of the important Texel sheep at the cell level but will also provide a valuable resource for genomic, postgenomic, somatic cloning research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207