MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052500751 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700561104

Insertion of group II intron retroelements after intrinsic transcriptional terminators

2007· article· en· W2052500751 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron R. Robart, Wooseok Seo, Steven Zimmerly

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntronBiologyGroup II intronGeneticsDNATerminator (solar)RNAMobile genetic elementsRNA splicingGenomeComputational biologyCell biologyGeneMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile DNAs use many mechanisms to minimize damage to their hosts. Here we show that a subclass of group II introns avoids host damage by inserting directly after transcriptional terminator motifs in bacterial genomes (stem-loops followed by Ts). This property contrasts with the site-specific behavior of most group II introns, which insert into homing site sequences. Reconstituted ribonucleo protein particles of the Bacillus halodurans intron B.h.I1 are shown to reverse-splice into DNA targets in vitro but require the DNA to be single-stranded and fold into a stem-loop analogous to the RNA structure that forms during transcription termination. Recognition of this DNA stem-loop motif accounts for in vivo target specificity. Insertion after terminators is a previously unrecognized strategy for a selfish DNA because it prevents interruption of coding sequences and restricts expression of the mobile DNA after integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207