MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052519926 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2011.576146

An anthropologist at the Social Forum: Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2010

2011· article· fr· W2052519926 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Scott Simon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiaspora, migration, transnational identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsAuthoritarianismMainland ChinaPolitical scienceDemocracySustainabilityMainlandSociologyMedia studiesChinaGeographyEcologyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The World Social Forum, with its goals of grassroots democracy and ecological sustainability, has been slow to take roots in the Chinese-speaking world. This research note describing the first Social Forum in Taiwan shows how the Social Forum is rooted in local networks and struggles. Due to the authoritarian regime on the Chinese mainland, there is little hope for a Social Forum there in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicDiaspora, migration, transnational identityFrench-language works237,207