Les relations entre le « politique » et « l’économique » dans le discours et les pratiques de la « guerre contre le terrorisme »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les relations entre les dimensions économiques et politiques des discours sécuritaires demeurent sous-analysées au sein de la discipline des Relations Internationales. L’étude critique de la nouvelle doctrine de sécurité américaine, de ses interventions en Irak et des effets de la « lutte contre le terrorisme » sur la société américaine suggère pourtant que des rapports contradictoires et complexes entre la « sphère du politique » et la « sphère de l’économique » sont en jeu. Ceux-ci s’articulent tout aussi densément aux niveaux discursif et pratique. L’objet de cet article est donc d’introduire l’analyse des « dimensions économiques » de la sécurité aux débats sur la « guerre contre le terrorisme » tout en considérant les apports considérables des approches qui s’intéressent à la nature construite des menaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".