New media and innovative technologies - by Tal Samuel-Azran & Dan Caspi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Israel based scholars Tal Samuel-Azran and Dan Caspi have brought together a collection of essays in their book New Media and Innovative Technologies with the aim to, “establish and conduct multi-directional dialogue and develop a discourse among media scholars, practitioners, entrepreneurs and policymakers” (p. 9). This collection makes a contribution to the growing body of information society and new media literature from a uses and gratifications perspective (U&G) on new media technologies and a global comparative approach among, mainly, non-western contexts, including the Middle East and Latin America. The range of topics covered in the ten chapters spans a number of different media platforms such as the killer application of the day, Second Life, social networks, Internet television, gaming, mobile phones, cyber-terrorism, and pagers. The authors are equally as diverse as they are based in the Balkans, the Middle East, Latin America, and the U.S. and work in media and communications, law, gaming studies, and psychology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it