MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052541233 · doi:10.1145/2507924.2507961

Distributed base station activation for energy-efficient operation of cellular networks

2013· article· en· W2052541233 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Abbasi, Majid Ghaderi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase stationComputer scienceScheduleMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)Energy consumptionCellular networkDistributed computingOptimization problemBase (topology)Utility maximization problemMaximizationComputer networkUtility maximizationEngineeringMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic base station activation (DBA) has recently emerged as a viable solution for reducing energy consumption in cellular networks. While most of the works on this topic focused on centralized decision making algorithms, in this paper we investigate distributive solutions. These solutions are particularly desirable due to importance of self-organization and self-optimization in future cellular networks. The goal of DBA is to achieve an optimal trade-off between network operator's revenue and operational cost while guaranteeing coverage for network users. The problem is posed as a network utility maximization aiming to find the optimal activation schedule of each base station. Using Lagrangian duality, the problem is decomposed into smaller subproblems, where each subproblem is solved locally at its associated base station. Controlled message passing among base stations ensures convergence to the global optimal solution. Moreover, this general solution is further extended to capture the combinatorial nature of DBA. Finally, numerical results are provided to demonstrate the behavior of our solution in terms of utility and cost trade-off and convergence in some example network scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207